English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Let M HL and M S respectively denote the Hardy-Littlewood and strong maximal operators, and let M x and M y respectively denote the one-dimensional Hardy-Littlewood maximal operators in the horizontal and vertical directions in R 2 . It is well known that if f and f are equidistributed functions supported on Q = [0,1] X [0,1], then f Q M HL f ∼ fQ M HL f. This article examines the relationships between f Q M y f and f Q M y f, f Q M y M x f and f Q M y M x f, and f Q M s f and f Q M s f in the scenario in which f and f are horizontal rearrangements of one another, meaning that f(.,y) and f(.,y) are equidistributed on [0,1] for any value of y. The rearrangement results provided are not only of intrinsic interest, but also yield tools for more detailed examinations involving the local integrablility of maximal functions. They are used in a companion paper to prove that if f is supported on Q, f Q M y M x f < oo, and f Q M m M y f = oo, then there exists a set A of finite measure in R 2 such that f A M S f = ∞.

Rearrangements and the local integrablility of maximal functions