English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Globalization has done little to fight global poverty and inequality. That can change if those in favor of a freer and fairer global trade and finance system link that regime with core worker rights. This connection will result in a reduction of global poverty and a more equitable distribution of trade gains. Prior to the U.S.-Cambodian Bilateral Textile Agreement (USCBTA), legal architectures linking free trade and global finance with core worker rights have adopted adjudicative or quasi-adjudicative models. By contrast, the USCBTA adopted a regulatory approach. This article analyzes the relative strengths and weaknesses of a regulatory model for international labor law enforcement and offers key recommendations for the future.

Tailoring Globalization to Reduce Global Poverty and Inequality: A Case Study of the U.S.-Cambodian Bilateral Textile Agreement