English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

The September 11 Victim Compensation Fund (VCF) is often described as "unprecedented," though it is but the latest in a long line of Federal disaster relief statutes. One such measure established a commission to compensate those who lost property to British attacks in the War of 1812. The history of this relief effort, which is remarkably similar to that of the VCF, reveals a characteristic moral trajectory traced by victims as they seek compensation. The closer victims come to receiving payment for their losses, the harder it is for them to maintain the appearance of blamelessness that is the source of their claim. This paper explores the political and moral issues that arise for both claimants and relief officials from this process.

The War of 1812, September 11th, and the Politics of Compensation