English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

This study compares,the ratings for three dimensions,of organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB) provided by managers (self-ratings), their subordinates, and their colleagues (superiors and peers) in the Spanish branch of a multinational food company. Using hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis, we find strong method effects, indicating that ratings from different sources provide different information. A comparison,among,means shows that, in most cases, subordinate and self-ratings are significantly higher than colleague ratings. Wealso add to the recent research about the dimensionality of OCB by performing a correlation analysis among,OCB dimensions,that controls for method,effects. Our results show that, when methods are taken into account, correlations among OCB dimensions are not significant. Key words: Organizational citizenship behaviour, rating source, self-ratings, method effect,

Effect of the Rating Source in Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Multitrait-multimethod Analysis