English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

This article examines one of the topical issues of Russian tax law, namely, the issue regarding the definition of a forfeit under the current Russian legislation on taxes and charges. The paper analyses the changes in the legal nature of forfeits under the Russian tax legislation—from the measure of responsibility for violation of tax legislation (in the 1990s) to the means of securing the performance of tax duty (with the entry into force of the Russian Tax Code in 1999). The research identifies the reasons for the alteration of the definition of a forfeit under Russian tax law and assesses the consequences for maintaining the balance of public and private interests in the tax law. The research formulates proposals on improving the legislation regulating tax relations for the computation and payment of forfeits

ssrn electronic journal

A Forfeit in Accordance with the Russian Tax Law: A Means of Securing the Performance of Tax Duty or a Measure of Responsibility for a Violation of Tax Rules?