English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We consider the explicit introduction of firms' choice of location to Varian's model of sales for a two-stage spatial competition model based on a standard Hotelling's linear city model. This model is the formalization of Varian's model of sales in the context of Hotelling's spatial competition. We obtain three main results. First, we show that there exists a subgame perfect equilibrium in which each firm chooses a symmetric mixed strategy equilibrium profile. This equilibrium includes symmetric location pairs and asymmetric location pairs. Second, the equilibrium behaviors in our model are randomized at both location and price stages. Third, we show that expected profits in a subgame perfect equilibrium are equal to the maximum monopoly profit from an uninformed market. Thus, even when product differentiation is explicitly introduced into a Varian-type model, Varian's implication can be retained; the opportunity for profit in an informed market is lost with competition.

Horizontal Product Differentiation in Varian's Model of Sales