English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

This article addresses the question of whether K-12 schools and school personnel owe a fiduciary obligation to the students with whom they interact. The article discusses the historic and current use of the loco parentis doctrine and case law and commentary that surrounds the creation and regulation of fiduciary duties. The article chronicles the split in decisional law concerning whether K-12 schools, administrators and teachers owe a fiduciary duty to students, including the reasons for the current state of the case law and commentary. The article then proposes and concludes that K-12 schools and teachers generally should not be held to owe or violate a fiduciary duty to students when they engage in conduct undertaken as a legitimate part of the purpose for which they are employed.

Back to the Future: The in Loco Parentis Doctrine and its Impact on Whether K-12 Schools and Teachers Owe a Fiduciary Duty to Students