English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

The present paper aims to delve into one of the most thrilling debates set out by the BEPS Project (specifically Action 1): the reconsideration of the permanent establishment threshold.Without disregarding the fiscal interests that have undeniably boosted the reopening of the discussion, we prefer to question the appropriateness of the PE from a different perspective. Firstly, we will analyse the theoretical principles that originally served to justify the PE threshold. Subsequently, we will demonstrate the obsolescence of the term -as it currently stands- as a result of the challenges posed by the so-called digital economy and in light of the aforementioned principles. Some proposals for the way forward will be briefly outlined.

An Opportunistic, and Yet Appropriate, Revision of the Source Threshold for the Twenty-First Century Tax Treaties