English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

In this paper I consider two ways by which the legitimacy of legal authorities might\udmotivate people to abide by the law. Following recent criminological research I define\udlegitimacy along two different dimensions: the first is the public recognition of the rightful\udauthority of an institution, and the second is a sense among citizens that the institution is just,\udmoral and appropriate. Data from a randomized controlled trial of procedurally just policing\udprovide further support for the idea that justice systems can secure compliance by (a) instilling\udin citizens a sense of deference and obligation, and (b) showing to citizens that they represent a\udrequisite sense of moral appropriateness. While prior work has tended to focus on the idea that\udlegitimacy shape compliance through felt obligation, the current analysis shows that\udcompliance is predicted by both duty to obey and moral endorsement. Consistent with a good\uddeal of existing evidence, the findings also indicate the importance of procedural justice and\udgroup identification in the production of institutional legitimacy. I conclude with the idea that\udlegitimacy may be able to shape compliance through shape content-free obligation and shared\udmoral appropriateness

On the Dual Motivational Force of Legitimate Authority