English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

The paper explores organizations designed to influence a group to choose specific alternatives from a set of possible choices. The perspective is that of an administrator that has personal objectives not shared by the group and can dictate organization but not group choice. The design works through subcommittees. The variables used to manipulate the group choice are the assignment of members to the subcommittees, the assignment of alternatives for subcommittee consideration (the committee charge or jurisdiction) and the rules followed during subcommittee deliberations. The model uses social choice theory and the core of game derived from cooperative games without side payments (in effectiveness form) as the principles that determine committee choices. Experiments demonstrate that for a fixed profile of individual preferences the organizational variables can be used to structure the game such that almost any alternative is a member of the core. The resulting model is a very accurate predictor of the group choice.

Mechanism Design with Public Goods: Committee Karate, Cooperative Games, and the Control of Social Decisions Through Subcommittees