English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Following the end of the Cold War, region-building has held out to many – academic commentators and practitioners alike – the prospect of creating new avenues for economic cooperation and security, and for restructuring the international order to cope with the onset of the pressures of globalization. As is well documented, the revitalization in the late 1980s and 1990s of the European Union’s (EU) project of regional integration across the three dimensions of economics, politics and security, also helped at the same time to spur on regional projects in the Asia-Pacific and Northeast and Southeast Asia. Regional projects such as Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) and the ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA) certainly differ significantly from European examples in being predicated primarily upon cooperation in the economic dimension, and emphasizing the development of ‘soft’ rather than ‘hard’ institutional arrangements (Katzenstein 1997: 12).

Tumen River Area Development Programme: Frustrated Micro-Regionalism as a Microcosm of Political Rivalries