English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

I address the causes of the gender wage gap with a new dynamic model of wage, hours, and jobchanges that permits me to decompose the gap into a portion due to gender differences in preferencesfor part-time work and in constraints. The dynamic model allows the differences in constraints toreflect possible gender differences in job arrival rates, job destruction rates, the mean and variance ofthe wage offer distribution, and the full-time/part-time wage premium. I find that the differences in preferences explain no more than 5% of the gender gap in hourly wages and 7-20% of the gender gap in weekly wages. The differences in constraints, mainly in the form of differences in the mean offeredwages, explain the remaining gender wage gap. Most of the gender differences in employment, hours of work and job turnover can be attributed to the differences in preferences

Explaining the Gender Wage Gap: Estimates from a Dynamic Model of Job Changes and Hours Changes