English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

In 2003, an anonymous plaintiff ('John Doe') filed suit in federal court against Kamehameha Schools, claiming that its 117-year-old admissions policy favoring indigenous Hawaiian children 'discriminates' against non-Hawaiians in violation of federal civil rights law. John Doe's attorneys called the policy 'categorical racial exclusion' and 'segregation.' They conjured up infamous images of George Wallace 'standing in the schoolhouse door to prevent the admission of qualified children simply because they have the wrong skin color and bloodline.' Native Hawaiians, on the other hand, decried the distortion of 'civil rights' to deny indigenous Hawaiians' claims to self-education and governance. For them, Kamehameha Schools offered no special privileges or 'racial preferences,' but instead provided a form of self-determination: 'We're not asking for a handout; we're asking to be able to take care of our own.' For Hawaiians, the Schools afforded a measure of restorative justice 'for a people in their own homeland who are suffering.'

Restorative Justice for Hawai'i's First People-Selected Amicus Curiae Briefs in Doe V. Kamehameha Schools