English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

The subjective well-being approach to the valuation of international development is applied to the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). The rich countries have particular preferences for education, healthcare, and housing; they need compensation for failure to meet the targets by 2015. The poor countries view all the targets as important; they can accept compensation for failure to achieve the targets by 2015, with amounts equivalent to what would have been 0.7% proportion of the incomes of the rich countries for international aid. The MDGs are affordable and doable, yet the rich countries are foot-dragging in fulfilling their pledges for international aid.

Subjective Well-Being Approach to the Valuation of International Development: Evidence for the Millennium Development Goals