English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

To what extent do ‘consent’ and ‘intention’ continue to have a role to play in the process of construing the terms of contracts? Is the adoption of an increasingly objective approach towards the interpretative process consistent with an assertion that it can be equiparated to the marginalisation of the role of consent? If the dynamics of concession and compromise in commercial negotiations are facets of party consent, in what way may (if at all) the prevalence of the commercially sensible construction function to elide consensus? These are some of the questions which the paper attempts to address.

Interpretation of Contracts, Objectivity and the Elision of Consent Reached Through Concession and Compromise