English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

This paper serves as an opportunity,to pull together some,thoughts,and questions,about modes,of incorporation,as an explanation,for ethnic differences in behavior. Specifically, I ask just what is the status of cultural explanations for ethnic behavior,if ethnic behavior,is approached,from a modes-of-incorporation perspective.,I ask this question both in connection,with individuals of the immigrant,generation as well as in connection,with the second,generation; the concern,with the second,generation leads me,to consider the status of cultural explanations,for ethnic behavior,in connection,with the related conception,of segmented,assimilation.,My argument,proceeds,through,four steps.,1) I note that the modes,are introduced,as a way,out of being left with a large ethnic residual (or unexplained,difference) from individual-level,analysis and as one more,way,of contradicting the claim that the residual reflects the operation,of independent,cultural differences among,groups.,2) I stress how,far we can push the corollary that living in different modes,can effect not only the structural opportunities available to a person but also the attitudes, values, and outlooks common,in people from different groups. 3) I also stress the possibility that many,specifics of an immigrant,group’s historical experiences,are not captured,by the modes of incorporation (as would be true of any typology), and that such historical specifics ignored by the typology,might matter a great deal. Moreover, such historically specific features may involve cultural characteristics as well as other characteristics, cultural characteristics related not at all or only tangentially to the aspects of experience,discussed,in the typology,of the modes. 4) A big question, from this perspective, then, is: how well do the modes in fact explain the residual ethnic differences unexplained,by the individual-level variables?,And how,do we answer,that question empirically? 1 I want,to use this opportunity,to pull together some,thoughts and questions,about modes of incorporation,as an explanation,for ethnic differences in behavior.,My approach,is highly

The Place of Cultural Explanations and Historical Specificity in Discussions of Modes of Incorporation and Segmented Assimilation