English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Interphase boundaries are planar defects that separate two different minerals, which in general have different compositions and/or crystalline structures; they may play an important role as a pathway for fluids in rocks and affect their physical properties. To completely characterize interphase boundaries, one needs to define the misorientation between adjacent grains and the orientation of the grain boundary plane. The analysis performed here is limited to the misorientation characterization and the trace of the interphase boundary. Although the determination of possible orientation relationships between the two adjacent phases is routinely performed by selected-area electron diffraction in a transmission electron microscope, this method lacks statistical representativeness. With the advent of techniques like electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD), it is possible to calculate orientation relationships not only in single pairs of crystals of the same phase but in full thin sections and between different minerals. The interphase misorientation is calculated from two orientations of two adjacent crystals of different phases. A set of single misorientations is then used to calculate the misorientation distribution function (MDF), from where it is possible to identify a maximum and its crystallographic interpretation. If we then know the misorientation and the unit-cell parameters of the individual phases, the crystallographic relationships between the different phases can be described with the pairs of parallel crystallographic planes and the pairs of crystallographic directions. In this paper, I present examples of the use of interphase misorientation analysis on the transformation of calcite-aragonite, olivine-antigorite, magnetite-hematite, and on the study of orientation relationships between plagioclase-olivine-ilmenite in mid-ocean ridges gabbros (ODP Hole 735).

Interphase misorientation as a tool to study metamorphic reactions and crystallization in geological materials