English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Clinozoisite and topaz are examined to pressures of 36 and 24 GPa, respectively, at 300 K using infrared spectroscopy. Both minerals metastably persist throughout this pressure range at ambient temperature. Both stretching and bending vibrations of the silicate tetrahedra are tracked upon compression and decompression of each phase, as are their hydroxyl-stretching vibrations. The hydroxylstretching vibrations lie at 3650 cm -1  in topaz and 3351 cm -1  in clinozoisite and shift by 0.6 (± 0.3) cm -1 /GPa and -5.1 (± 0.9) cm -1 /GPa, respectively. Therefore, the hydrogen bonding in clinozoisite and topaz responds completely differently to pressure: hydrogen bonding increases in clinozoisite, but decreases in topaz. The clinozoisite hydroxyl-stretching vibration also broadens by almost a factor of six under compression. Both the clinozoisite peak shift and its pressure-induced broadening are simulated using a model of the hydrogen bond potential. The markedly different structural responses of these two minerals to pressure are interpreted on crystal-chemical grounds, and demonstrate that the bonding of hydrogen in possible subduction-related hydrous phases varies dramatically, depending on crystal chemistry.

Contrasting bonding behavior of two hydroxyl-bearing metamorphic minerals under pressure: Clinozoisite and topaz