English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

A new approach for modeling anisotropic peak broadening with Rietveld analysis has been tested on a biologically grown soil greigite, whose morphology (as determined by TEM, Stanjek et al. 1994) had a symmetry lower than cubic. The anisotropic morphology of this greigite determined with single peak fitting was more evident than with the Rietveld analysis in the cubic setting, because in Rietveld analysis {hhh} reflections are treated as one reflection, although two different peak breadths are required: one for modeling two (hhh) reflections perpendicular to the [111] axis of elongation and one for modeling the remaining six (hhh) reflections. For assessing the lower morphological symmetry, the cubic structure was transformed into the tetragonal and into the trigonal system. In both crystal systems, the axis of shape anisotropy is [001]. Due to splitting of peaks, the anisotropic morphology became then measurable. Contributions from other likely sources of anisotropic peak broadening, such as stacking faults and chemical inhomogeneities could be ruled out.

Anisotropic peak broadening analysis of a biogenic soil greigite (Fe 3 S 4 ) with Rietveld analysis and single peak fitting