English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Studies were conducted at three locations in Florida to evaluate the effects of kasugamycin alone, in alternation, or as a tank-mix partner with copper bactericides and other fungicides against bacterial spot of tomato. In greenhouse trials, kasugamycin, formulated as Kasumin2L,reduced bacterial spot severityby upto37.5% comparedwith a non-treated control. Little advantage in disease control was observed by mixing kasugamy- cinwith other fungicides. Kasugamycin was assessedin sixfield trials.In the fourfield trials that tested kasugamycin alone, it was as effective as the standard copper + mancozeb treatmentforthecontrolofbacterialspot.Infourtrials,nobenefitwasobservedinapplying kasugamycin as a mixture with copper + mancozeb, and only one of three trials did alternating kasugamycin with copper + mancozeb improve bacterial spot control over either the copper + mancozeb standard or kasugamycin alone. Although kasugamycin was effectiveforthecontrolofbacterialspotingreenhouseandfieldtrials,rapiddevelopmentof resistance infield populations of X. perforans mayshorten the effective useof this antibiotic.

Comparison of Kasugamycin to Traditional Bactericides for the Management of Bacterial Spot on Tomato