English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The loss of methyl bromide (MB) as a soil fumigant has created the need for new weed management systems for crops such as strawberry (Fragaria xananassa Duchesne). Potential alternative chemicals to replace methyl bromide fumigation include 1,3-D, chloropicrin (CP), and metam sodium. Application of emulsified formulations of these fumigants through the drip irrigation system is being tested as an alternative to the standard shank injection method of fumigant application in strawberry production. The goal of this research was to evaluate the weed control efficacy of alternative fumigants applied through the drip irrigation system and by shank injection. The fumigant 1,3-D in a mixture with CP was drip-applied as InLine (60% 1,3-D plus 32% CP) at 236 and 393 L.ha -1 or shank injected as Telone C35 (62% 1,3-D plus 35% CP) at 374 L.ha -1 . Chloropicrin (CP EC, 95%) was drip-applied singly at 130 and 200 L.ha -1 or shank injected (CP, 99%) at 317 kg.ha -1 . Vapam HL (metam sodium 42%) was drip-applied singly at 420 and 700 L.ha -1 . InLine was drip-applied at 236 and 393 L.ha -1 , and then 6 d later followed by (fb) drip-applied Vapam HL at 420 and 700 L.ha -1 , respectively. CP EC was drip-applied simultaneously with Vapam HL at 130 plus 420 L.ha -1 and as a sequential application at 200 fb 420 L.ha -1 , respectively. Results were compared to the commercial standard, MB: CP mixture (67:33) shank-applied at 425 kg.ha -1 and the untreated control. Chloropicrin EC at 200 L.ha -1 and InLine at 236 to 393 L.ha -1 each applied singly controlled weeds as well as MB: CP at 425 kg.ha -1 . Application of these fumigants through the drip irrigation systems provided equal or better weed control than equivalent rates applied by shank injection. InLine and CP EC efficacy on little mallow (Malva parviflora L.) or prostrate knotweed (Polygonum aviculare L.) seed buried at the center of the bed did not differ from MB: CP. However, the percentage of weed seed survival at the edge of the bed was often higher in the drip-applied treatments than in the shank-applied treatments, possibly due to the close proximity of the shank-injected fumigant to the edge of the bed. Vapam HL was generally less effective than MB: CP on the native weed population or on weed seed. The use of Vapam HL in combination with InLine or CP EC did not provide additional weed control benefit. Chemical names used: 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D); sodium N-methyldithiocarbamate (metam sodium); methyl bromide; trichloronitromethane (chloropicrin).

Weed Control in Strawberry Provided by Shank- and Drip-applied Methyl Bromide Alternative Fumigants