English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Five taxa of Atlantic white cedar [ Chamaecyparis thyoides  (L.) B.S.P.], `Blue Sport', `Okefenokee', Raulston Form, `Emily', and `Rachel', and one cultivar of Leyland cypress [× Cupressocyparis leylandii  (Jacks. and Dallim.) Dallim.], `Haggerston Grey', were screened for resistance to  Botryosphaeria  and  Seiridium  cankers. Treatments consisted of  Seiridium unicorne  (Cke. And Ell.) Sutton,  Botryodiplodia  Sacc. sp.,  Fusicoccum Corda . sp. and the non-inoculated control. After 8 weeks, plants were measured for change in caliper at the wound site, change in plant height, and length and width of surface and interior cankers.  Seiridium  and  Botryosphaeria  canker development on Atlantic white cedar taxa was not significantly different than that on Leyland cypress.  Seiridium unicorne  was more pathogenic than  Botryodiplodia  sp. and  Fusicoccum  sp. on Atlantic white cedar and Leyland cypress with infection percentages of 100%, 84%, and 80%, respectively. Well-defined, sunken, resinous cankers developed on Leyland cypress plants infected with  Seiridium unicorne , whereas Atlantic white cedar showed no visible surface canker.

015 Susceptibility of Atlantic White Cedar, Chamaecyparis thyoides (L.) B.S.P., to Botryosphaeria and Seiridium Cankers