English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

In the provision of care for frail older people, families play a crucial role in Western industrialised societies. In the case of the “conservative” welfare regime (Obinger and Wagschal 2000), to which Switzerland can broadly be assigned, public services are meant to be subsidiary to familial care (Haberkern 2009). However, recent research on day and night care has shown that public services are rarely used (Werner et al. 2016; Köppel 2015). In the presented paper, different reasons for the non-use of day and night care will be investigated from a systematic and multidimensional perspective, taking into account different factors on different levels (Hümbelin 2019, Lucas et al. 2019, Bieri 2018, ODENORE 2012). The aim of the paper is to broaden the analyses on the use and non-take up of day and night care structures, referring to international research and literature from different policy fields. It lays the foundations for analysing findings of an empirical study, which we are able to publish after the conference.

Some conceptual thoughts on the non-take up of social benefits in Switzerland : unequal access to day and night care