English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

: It was concluded that: (1) Randomly placed dolos are an acceptable option, provided that a stability coefficient of 12 is used to size the units; (2) Dolos stability proved to be sensitive to relative depth (d/L) and relative wave height (H/d) with minimum stability occurring at the lower values of d/L and higher values of H/d, i.e., longer wave periods in shallower water; (3) Randomly placed tribars are not recommended at slopes steeper than IV on 2H; however, they may be used at milder slopes with a stability coefficient of 9; (4) Uniformly placed tribars are an acceptable option for a IV-on-1.5H slope, provided they are used in concert with toe buttressing stone, size selections is based on a stability coefficients of 7, and placement of the units replicates that used in the model; (5) Tribar stability appears to be insensitive to d/L and H/d for both types of placement.

Stability of Dolos and Tribar Overlays for Rehabilitation of Stone-Armored Rubble-Mound Breakwater and Jetty Trunks Subjected to Breaking Waves