English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

: Laboratory tests were performed in a basin to compare the flexural strength of urea ice obtained by three different beam test methods. The beam test used were in the in-situ three-point loaded simple beam test, the out-of- water three-point loaded simple beam test and the in-situ cantilever beam test. There is essentially no difference in flexural strength determined from either of the three-point beam test is also approximately equal to the value determined from the in-situ cantilever beam test. A reduction in flexural strength with increases in beam length-to-thickness ratio was observed for portions of the data set. Keywords: Cantilever beam test, Flexural strength, Laboratory tests, Model ice, Simple beam test, Urea ice.

A Comparison of Test Methods for Determination of Flexural Strength in Urea Model Ice