English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Supplemental irrigation has been recommended in wet regions as a way of reducing the risk of water deficiency, although there are no design criteria for irrigation systems applied to these regions, therefore the same criteria developed for arid regions have been adopted. In this study, the effective rainfall values obtained from the American Soil Conservation Service and the hourly and daily water balance models were compared with the values of probable or dependent rainfall. Different design criteria were applied to the meteorological data from Urussanga Station, in the brazilian state of Santa Catarina, l (28,31o S, 49,19o W, altitude 48,2 m).The results, led to the conclusion that the average monthly effective rainfall, estimated by SCS methods, shows values higher than those obtained from the daily and hourly water balance models. The inclusion of the Curve Number method in the daily water balance does not lead to any difference in effective rainfall for soils with a CN ranging from 60 to 90. The criterion for dimensioning the irrigation project using the difference between the average evapotranspiration and the probable rainfall, underestimates the needs for irrigation requirement.

Avaliação de Métodos para Dimensionamento da Irrigação Suplementar em Clima Úmido