English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The redox potentials of cobalt and iron complexes with ten pyridylazo compounds, E(0)(ML2) (ML(2)(+/0); M: Co(III/II), Fe(III/II); L(-): pyridylazo compounds), have been determined in order to explore the difference in their reversed-phase HPLC behavior. The redox potentials of Co complexes were in the range of -0.62 - 0.03 V, while those of Fe complexes were -0.06 - 0.59 V relative to 0.20 V for ferricinium/ferrocene. The redox potentials of both the Co and Fe complexes were linearly correlated to the basicities of the ligands. The correlation was quantitatively explained by a difference in dependence of the stabilities of M(III) and M(II) complexes on the ligand basicities. The complex of [Co(III)L(2)](+) or [Fe(II)L(2)] with any compound injected in the reversed-phase HPLC system was detected without any change in the composition. When [Co(II)L(2)] was injected, only those complexes having the highest potentials of E(0)(CoL2) congruent with 0.0 V were detected as [Co(II)L(2)], while other complexes having lower potentials gave a peak of [Co(III)L(2)](+). When [Fe(III)L(2)](+) was injected, only complexes having the lowest potentials of E(0)(FeL2) congruent with 0.0 V were detected as [Fe(III)L(2)](+), while others having higher potentials gave a peak of [Fe(II)L(2)].

Redox Potentials and HPLC Behavior of Cobalt and Iron Complexes with Pyridylazo Compounds