English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Objective: To compare the treatment costs of different sequences of regimens including monoclonal antibodies in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRCm) treatment for the Brazilian Supplementary Healthcare System. Methods:  Sixteen scenarios were analyzed, each one comparing a sequence of bevacizumab TML plus an anti-EGFR therapy in the third–line with another sequence without bevacizumab TML (non-Bev TML) in patients with CRCm wild-type RAS. The anti-EGFRs cetuximab and panitumumab were included. The monthly and total costs of the therapeutic sequences were compared per patient. Results: The sequences with Bev TML were cost-saving in 50% of all scenarios, and especially observed over regimens starting with cetuximab in the first-line treatment. Regarding scenarios which the non-Bev TML sequences were less costly, they all started with bevacizumab followed by an anti-EGFR biologic drug. Conclusion: The Bev TML regimens were cost-saving compared to scenarios of non-Bev TML which started with cetuximab, and sequential use of bevacizumab beyond progression and the addition of an anti-EGFR biologic drug in the third-line for mCRC treatment. Considering the remaining scenarios in which Bev-TML was not cost-saving, those starting with Bev presented lower costs in total. Therefore, starting a treatment with bevacizumab seems to enable a more rational management of resource usage, as well as, to allow physicians to add a biologic drug in the third-line, potentially enhancing the long term management of wild-type RAS mCRC. RESUMO Objetivo: Comparar o custo de tratamento de diferentes sequências de regimes incluindo anticorpos monoclonais no tratamento de câncer colorretal metastático (CCRm) no Sistema de Saúde Suplementar Brasileiro. Métodos: Dezesseis cenários foram analisados, cada um comparando uma sequência de bevacizumabe TML (Bev TML) mais um anti-EGFR em terceira linha, com outra sequência sem bevacizumabe TML (não-Bev TML). Os anti-EGFRs cetuximabe e panitumumabe forma incluídos. Os custos mensais e totais do sequenciamento terapêutico foram comparados por pacientes. Resultados: As sequências com Bev TML trouxeram economia de recursos em 50% de todos os cenários, e especialmente comparado aos regimes iniciando com cetuximabe em primeira linha de tratamento. Considerando os cenários em que os regimes não-Bev TML apresentaram menos custo, todos iniciaram o sequenciamento com bevacizumabe seguido de um medicamento biológico anti-EGFR. Conclusões: Os regimes Bev TML apresentaram economia de recursos comparado aos cenários com não-Bev TML que iniciaram com cetuximabe, apesar do uso de bevacizumabe em múltiplas linhas e da adição de medicamento biológico anti-EGFR em terceira linha no tratamen

Sequential biological therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): a cost comparison analysis for wildtype RAS mCRC patients in Brazil