English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

First systematic efforts to establish sociocultural anthropology as an independent fi eld appeared in Czech academia only after the year 1989. These efforts did not meet with much apparent success for a long time, and this provoked many authors who professed themselves as sociocultural anthropologists to criticize the unsatisfactory state of Czech anthropology. The most important of these criticisms are those by Zdeněk Nešpor and Marek Jakoubek. Both authors tried to demarcate the essence of sociocultural anthropology in their texts and oppose the fact that the name was often used as a label for approaches that had little to do with actual sociocultural anthropology. The present article aspires to a discussion with both of these authors. The main thrust of the argument lies in a conviction that if we accept Nešpor’s and Jakoubek’s demarcations of sociocultural anthropology, we paradoxically give up the best that sociocultural anthropology offers.

Čím vším může být sociokulturní antropologie