English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

It is a well-known fact that clinical laboratory test results are one of major contributors to most if not all clinical decisions and are one of the most cost-efficient tools in the modern healthcare. However, they may also be a source of significant waste of resources and contribute to errors in patient management. In order to minimize the latter, clinical laboratories are responsible for development and implementation of the most rigorous quality control (QC) processes that should adhere to latest scientific advancements and highest industry standards. This review is an attempt to analyze some past, present, and future trends in laboratory QC processes, their drawbacks, limitations, and advantages. It is also intended to share the author’s experience in development and implementation of patient-based real-time QC processes and algorithms in the national reference laboratory network.

journal of laboratory and precision medicine

Past, present, and future of laboratory quality control: patient- based real-time quality control or when getting more quality at less cost is not wishful thinking