English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The purpose of this research was determine the effect of free variables that the method of exercise and the moderator variable reaction time of the dependent variable of 100 meters. The research was done by using experimental method. Target population (research population) are male student of physical education, health and recreation islamic university of riau 2016/2017 123 people. Sampling was done by purposive sampling technique. The hypothesis is 1) difference between group of interval training method (A1) with group of continuous training method (A2) equal to 0,0245 < 0,05, mean h0 rejected. 2) The difference between group of interval training method (A1) and group of mixed exercise method (A3), value = 0,0015 < 0,05, means h0 rejected. 3) The difference between the continuous training method group (A2) and the mixed exercise method group (A3), worth = 0.1345 > 0.05, means h0 received. 4) The interaction effect of fo (AB) worth = 0,000 < 0.05 means h0 is rejected. 5) Differences in 100 meters of skill results between interval training methods with high reaction time and continuous training method with high reaction time (A1B1 A2B1) valued at 0.000 < 0.05 means h0 is rejected. 6) Differences in 100 meters of skill result between interval training method with high reaction time and mixed reaction method with high reaction time (A1B1 A3B1). Value = 0,000 < 0,05 means h0 is rejected. 7) Differences in 100 meter running skills results between continuous training method with high reaction time and high mixed reaction method (A2B1 A3B1) method = 0,000 < 0,05 means h0 is rejected. 8) Differences in the results of 100 meter running skills between interval training methods with low reaction time and continuous training method with low reaction time (A1B2 A2B2) valued = 0.413 > 0.05 means h0 received. 9) Differences in the results of 100 meter running skills between interval training methods with low reaction time and mixed reaction method with low reaction time (A1B2 A3B2) worth = 0.0155 < 0.05 means h0 is rejected. 10) The difference of 100 meter running skill result between continuous training method with low reaction time and mixed reaction method with low reaction time(A2B2 A3B2) worth = 0,026 < 0,05 means h0 is rejected.

THE INFLUENCE OF EXERCISE METHOD AND REACTIONS TIME TO SKILLS SPRINT 100 METERS