English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Once per term of office, local authorities, according to the bill on spatial planning, have to fulfill obligation to assess the adequacy of spatial development study, in Polish – studium uwarunkowań i kierunków zagospodarowania przestrzennego gminy (referred furthermore to as SUiKZP), as well as master plans (respectively, MPZP) which form the legislative reference for development in a community. The assessment is defined in a general way, and thus most often its elaboration is perceived as a response to legal obligation. Such an assumption frequently converts the assessment and its generative procedure 144 s p a c e & FORM | p r z e s t r z e ń i FORMa ‘28_2016 into reduced, void content, being result of intentionally limited expectations of local authorities. It produces documents devoid of purpose, and hence, of sense, too. There are many communities which attempt to use this assessment as monitoring tool, means to diagnose the status of the environment approximately every four years. The assessment of validity of study approaches multiple issues including coherence of master plans with overall policy, number of petitions and applications to alter of regulations imposed by SUiKZP, accordance with current legal framework or timely guidelines. Meanwhile one should remember that basic principles of spatial order should not be the product of reactive planning, known also as ad hoc planning. The assessment should create opportunity for a community to reflect on the foundations of spatial policy, on diagnosis of negative tendencies, and indication of means to overcome problems as well as establish long-term planning perspective. The team of authors consists of representatives of three distinct academic centers. Their work refers to the methodology of the assessment of validity of spatial development study. Starting from basic information on status of space in a community, the paper displays elements which are not explicitly indicated in the bill, but are compulsory to acquire continuity of conceptual thoughts related to spatial order and sustainable development. It discusses authors' approach to the assessment, the way it is structured, and its final, preferred role seen in reference of SUiKZP. The study should follow the traces marked in the assessment in order to achieve joint positive impact of both documents.

THE METHODOLOGICAL AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF THE ASSESSMENT OF VALIDITY OF DEVELOPMENT STUDY FOR CREATION OF SPATIAL POLICY