English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

espanolRESUMEN Introduccion: Se presenta una revision del CAD-R (Cuestionario de afrontamiento al dolor reducido) (1) en una muestra de 4.389 pacientes diagnosticados con dolor cronico derivada de un estudio multicentrico de toda Espana (2). Material y metodo: Se analiza la estructura factorial mediante analisis factorial exploratorio (AFE) y confirmatorio (AFC), asi como la fiabilidad (consistencia interna y test retest a los tres meses, esta ultima sobre 2.825 pacientes). Se ponen a prueba cuatro modelos constatando que las estrategias de primer orden correlacionadas son las que aportan mejores indices de ajuste. Resultados: Tanto los indices de consistencia interna como los test-retest resultan aceptables. Conclusiones: El CAD-R aparece como un instrumento que presenta una buena fiabilidad y una estructura factorial de seis estrategias de primer orden. EnglishABSTRACT Introduction: A review of the CAD-R (Cuestionario de afrontamiento al dolor reducido) (1) is presented in a sample of 4.389 patients diagnosed with chronic pain derived from a spanish multicenter study (2). Material and method: The factorial structure is analyzed by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory (CFA), as well as reliability (internal consistency and test-retest at three months, the latter of which is 2.825 patients). Four models are tested proving that correlated first-order strategies are those that provide better adjustment indices. Results: Both internal consistency and test-retest indices are acceptable. Conclusion: CAD-R appears as an instrument that presents good reliability and a factorial structure of six first-order strategies.

CAD-R. Cuestionario de afrontamiento al dolor crónico: análisis factorial confirmatorio. ¿Hay diferencias individuales en sexo, edad y tipo de dolor?