English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Wastewater treatment has increased in recent decades. The objective of this study was to compare two systems for wastewater treatment. The first system was the submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR) and the second was the conventional system of activated sludge (RLA). The parameters evaluated were total chemical oxygen demand (COD total ), soluble chemical oxygen demand (COD soluble ), phosphates (PO 4 3– ), nitrates (NH 4 + ), nitrites (NO 3 – ), total suspended solids (TSS), volatile suspended solids (VSS) and pH, and were determined in samples obtained from the feeding and the effluent of the systems three times a week. The wastewater used in the two reactors was prepared daily to avoid degradation in the storage tank. The results, like the COD Total , show that there is an improvement using the SMBR with respect to the RLA. Besides, the filtration carried out allowed a greater removal of TSS and the nitrification process in the SMBR converted NH 4 + in NO 3 – . It is concluded that the effluent of the SMBR is of better quality because it had less contaminants and it can be used for wastewater treatment.

COMPARACIÓN DE UN BIORREACTOR CON MEMBRANAS SUMERGIDAS CON UN SISTEMA CONVENCIONAL DE LODOS ACTIVADOS PARA EL TRATAMIENTO DE AGUAS RESIDUALES