English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Objective -The aim of this study was to determine the comparison of functional clinical outcome of metastase spine disease before and after the action of posterior spinal instrumentation. Material and Methods-This Research using Sixty-one (61) subjects of spine disease metastases were divided into 2 groups, with thirty-six (36) subjects not operating and twenty-five (25) subjects operating spinal posterior instrumentation that met the criteria of Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) in the period September 2014 to February 2018 included in the inclusion criteria included in this study where twenty-two (22) total subjects were obtained and data was collected by interviewing techniques assessing clinical outcomes based on VAS, ODI and SF-36.Result-The distribution of 22 Metastase Spine Disease samples with 12 females (54.5%) and 10 females (45.5%) men, with the youngest age of the 41 years research subjects and the oldest age from the 78-year study subjects with mean and standard deviations amounting to 51.7 ± 14.0 years. There were significant differences in results from clinical outcomes before and after the action of posterior spinal instrumentation with a significance value of 0.001 (p <0.05).Conclusion-The functional clinical outcome of metastase spine disease after posterior spinal instrumentation is better than clinical outcome before the action of posterior spinal instrumentation with statistical values (P <0.01), this is in accordance with the initial hypothesis of the study, namely there are differences in functional clinical outcome of spinal metastase patients disease before and after the action of posterior spinal instrumentation.

international journal of chemtech research

Clinical Outreach of Functional Metastase Spine Disease Before and After the Measurement of Posterior Bone Instrumentation in Haji Adam Malik Hospital, Medan