English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background: To explore the curative effects of laparosopic panhysterectomies and summarize perioperative care experience.Methods: Forty cases of perioperative hysterectomy, twenty laparoscopic hysterectomies and twenty abdominal hysterectomies were selected for a controlled analysis of treatment efficacies of different nursing measures.Results: Laparoscope surgery durations were longer than abdominal surgery durations. Laparoscopic surgery had lesser bleeding, quicker postoperative ambulation times, shorter intestinal bowel function recovery times, lower patient stress, better patient quality of life, shorter hospitalization stays, and reduced patient economic burdens. Laparoscopic surgery resulted in fewer postoperative complications, reduced nursing care, which improved care effectiveness, and significantly increased patient satisfaction with nursing care.Conclusion: Laparoscopic panhysterectomies have advantages, including smaller abdominal incisions, shorter hospital stays, improved bed turnover rates, low infection rates, and fast recovery. Its curative effect is superior to the abdominal hysterectomy and it is more suitable clinically. Increased patient supervision and care given during the perioperative period facilitates post-operative healing.

Panhysterectomies-A Comparison of Perioperative Care of Abdominal and Laparoscopic