English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The essence of legality principle is “None is punishable for doing something unless it is forbidden by law established prior to the action”. Consequently, actor of wrongdoing will not be criminally prosecuted unless penal statutes prohibit what he or she has done. The purpose of this article is to criticize the basic philosophy of legality principle. The point of departure of the critique is ontological basis of legality principle; subsequently, it goes to axiological basis of the principle. By ideological critique, it is to open up to view and at the same time criticize the basic substance and value of legality principle. In addition, this article also reexamines the legality principle. I t is found that from both ontological and axiological bases, legality principle has shortcoming in that it relies upon statute rather than the substance of the conduct that may harm another. This article recommends that another more comprehensive principle be introduced, in which ‘any crime should be punished if it contradicts criminal law’ or nullum crimen (delictum) nulla poena sine prǽvia iure poenali (No offense, no punishment without criminal law previously exists). Key words: Ideological Critique , ontological and axiological bases , and sine prǽvia iure

KRITIK IDEOLOGIS TERHADAP DASAR KEFILSAFATAN ASAS LEGALITAS DALAM HUKUM PIDANA