English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Pro

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Presents AI Discovery search usage as a premium feature

AI Discovery

Presents AI Discovery explain and summary usage as a premium feature

Content Analysis

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

1500 Top-up

3000 Top-up

Zendy Basic

2500 Top-up

Zendy Unlimited

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Traditionally education in China has been subjected to rigorous central regulation by the Chinese government. During the last two decades it has undergone processes of decentralization to reduce centrally directed activity. This article is devoted to exploring the educational effects of higher education policy from the establishment of new China in 1953 to 2013. It uses multiple policy documents to critically examine the special features of Chinese higher education administrative system, which is represented as a strong sense of “state instrumentism”, and analyzes the relationship between the central and provincial governments and higher educational institutions. With an analysis of policy texts, this study discusses the challenges that Chinese government confronts with while renovating its higher education and proposes strategies to address this challenging situation. Taking Guangdong government’s policy as an example, this paper examines the role of the Guangdong provincial government in the process of renovating and developing local higher education.

The Changing Role of Governance in China’s Higher Education System