English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Ethical  guidelines  mandate  that  the  researcher  must  obtain  written  informed  consent  either  from  the  participant  or  from  an impartial witness before commencing data collection. This  case study describes some issues faced in trying to put this into  practice. The research project in which these issues arose aimed  to study occupational health problems and healthcare­seeking  practices among workers in the unorganised e­waste sector in  a south Indian city. The process of collecting written informed  consent  proceeded  smoothly  until  the  passage  of  the  Citizenship  Amendment  Act.  This  made  these  workers  extremely anxious. They were ready to participate but refused  to  sign  any  document.  In  these  circumstances,  identifying  an  “impartial  witness”  or  a  “study  independent  person”,  the  recommended  alternative  to  written  consent  by  the  institutional ethics committee, was impossible, given the closeknit  community  that  was  being  studied  and  the  fact  that  everyone  was  involved  in  one  way  or  the  other  with  e­waste  related work.

Challenges of informed consent during a political crisis: A case study of research with a marginalised group