English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

    Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is a common hormonal disorder associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The treatment of SHPT should lead to a reduction in parathormone concentrations by calcimimetics or active vitamin D administration and stabilization of calciumand phosphate metabolism. In the event of failure of conservative treatment, complete or partial parathyroid resection should be considered. OBJECTIVES    The aim of the study was to assess the beneficial effects of a combination treatment with paricalcitol and cinacalcet in comparison with paricalcitol alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS    A total of 64 hemodialyzed patients (mean [SD] age, 58 [16] years) with inadequate control of serum parathyroid hormone levels were treated with intravenous paricalcitol, while 16 patients simultaneously received oral cinacalcet. Laboratory tests (intact parathormone [iPTH], calcium, phosphorus) were performed on a monthly basis. In the study, iPTH, calium, phosphorus, and alkaline phosphatase levels were assessed at baseline and after 24 weeks of treatment with paricalcitol alone or in combination with cinacalcet. RESULTS    In both groups, a significant decrease in the iPTH level was observed. Although paricalcitol affects calcium levels, no hypercalcemia was observed. The combination treatment did not result in a significant lowering of iPTH levels in comparison with paricalcitol alone. CONCLUSIONS    Treatment of SHPT with intravenous paricalcitol in patients on hemodialysis is effective and has a good safety profile. The combination of paricalcitol and cinacalcet does not improve the outcomes. Moreover, the combined treatment does not affect calcium and phosphorus concentrations. The cost‑effectiveness of therapy should also be considered.

Does combination of paricalcitol with cinacalcet in secondary hyperparathyroidism in hemodialysis treatment make sense?