English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

One of the remarkable achievements of contemporary international criminal law is the development of the concept of individual criminal responsibility (Werle, 2007). Prior to the end of the Second World War, there was no international legal or institutional framework to sustain criminal charges. Individuals alleged to have committed serious international crimes were charged before national courts. The creation of the International Military Tribunals for Nuremberg and the Far East provided a reprieve and platform for the prosecution of individuals responsible for heinous crimes in the Second World War (Sands and Klein, 2004). This was followed by ad hoc tribunals for the former Yugoslavia, Rwanda, Cambodia and Sierra Leone, among others

The ICC: A Global Court to Fight Impunity or a Court Targeting Africans