English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The comprehensive claim for validity of the neoclassical paradigm can be shown perfectly by the example of the New Political Economy or the Economic Theory of Policy. The political process attracted many scientists1 who tried to explain the political events by using economic theories2. The model of competing parties is common to these theories; this model was developed by Downs who transferred Hotelling's model of spatial competition (Hotelling, 1929) to the political events of a representative democracy (Kirsch, 1974; Dinkel, 1977). Besides that, the New Political Economy examines log rolling (Buchanan, 1975), the aggregation of individual preferences (Arrow, 1963), the behaviour of associations (Olson, 1965) and bureaucracy (Niskanen, 1971) and problems of shape and origin of constitutions (Buchanan, 1975).

A Model Based on the Theory of Evolution as a Means of Explaining the Political Process in Democracies