English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

On being invited to write something “informative or evocative” I really couldn’t resist the temptation to be a little provocative and return to a theme that I have touched on before (Rust, 2007), and is a particular bete noir of mine. Although I have to admit that, given I have no reason to believe that what I wrote previously has had any discernable impact, there is a slight sense of futility even as I start. In fact there is an obvious irony in spending time re-stating information about how stated information has been consistently ignored for years. Is presenting an argument for change in our practices, however logical and well supported by evidence, simply a futile act? And if so, what can bring about change? But that is perhaps another paper.

The Unscholarly Use of Numbers in Our Assessment Practices: What Will Make Us Change?