English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Most of the set of international child abduction cases are a tragic and painful manifestation of a marriage or couple crisis. In this framework, cross-border withholding, in the face of strictly internal situations, has as its distinctive element the displacement or transfer of the minor in charge of the abducer in order to find a different legal system of coverage that is more favorable to his interests. To avoid multiple damages and in order to preserve the best interests of the minor, Council Regulation (EC) 2201/2003 shields competition in this matter in favor of the courts of the minor’s habitual residence. Although, the great diversity of causes underlying child abduction should not be ignored when proposing the most appropriate solution.

Particularidades acerca de la autoridad judicial competente en supuestos de sustracción ilícita de menores en aras del Reglamento (CE) 2201/ 2003