English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In the last years several arbitral tribunals constituted according to the ICSID Convention and Rules have ruled on a potential power to reconsider preliminary decisions issued in bifurcated or trifurcated proceedings (jurisdiction, merits and quantum ). The most recent arbitral practice has favored the recognition of this power changing the legal position previously maintained. The different interpre­tations made by these arbitral tribunals on the res judicata principle and their inherent powers allow us to reflect on two main questions; on the one side, the implications of the consolidation of such a power for the current system of remedies foreseen in the ICSID normative framework; and, on the other side, the problems of coherence inside the ICSID system as well as in relation to General International Law.

La reconsideración ante el CIADI: un mecanismo procesal para fomentar la corrección del laudo