English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Resumen: Este trabajo explica con argumentos historicos y de logica economica que la litigacion internacional, de por si ya costosa, peculiar y complicada, puede verse seriamente perjudicada por foros ineficientes. En esta linea, se pone de manifiesto que la regla actor sequitur forum rei , el foro del domi­cilio del demandado, es ineficiente pese a la difusion universal de dicha regla juridica. Actor sequitur penaliza el comercio internacional, desincentiva la actividad internacional de los particulares y benefi­cia en modo muy significativo la posicion del demandado, que es con frecuencia el incumplidor de los deberes juridicos. El trabajo pone de relieve, tambien, que en el Reglamento Bruselas I bis, el foro del domicilio del demandado es un mero foro residual, subsidiario a la sumision de las partes, desplazados por los foros exclusivos y alternativo a los foros especiales por razon de la materia. Por ultimo, se sos­tiene que el TJUE, pese a sus afirmaciones en forma de clausula de estilo, no ha interpretado los foros especiales como excepciones al foro del domicilio del demandado ni de modo restrictivo, sino como opciones jurisdiccionales para el demandante que son objeto de una lectura expansiva. Palabras clave: actor sequitur forum rei , domicilio del demandado, litigacion internacional, foros especiales, principio de eficiencia, Reglamento Bruselas I bis, interpretacion europea. Abstract: This essay explains with historical arguments and economic logic that international li­tigation, already expensive, peculiar and complicated, can be seriously damaged by inefficient grounds of jurisdictions. It is clear that the rule “actor sequitur forum rei”, the forum of the defendant’s domicile, is inefficient despite the universal dissemination of this legal rule. Actor sequitur damages international trade, discourages the international activity of individuals and benefits in a very significant way the po­sition of the defendant, who is often he who breaches some legal duties. This work also highlights that in the Brussels I bis Regulation, the defendant’s domicile works as a mere residual ground of jurisdiction. It operates as subsidiary to the submission of the parties, and is an alternative to the special grounds of jurisdiction. Finally, the ECJ, despite its assertions, has not interpreted those special grounds as excep­tions to the defendant’s domicile. To say the truth, the ECJ has also defended an expansive reading of those special grounds of jurisdictions. Keywords: actor sequitur forum rei , defendant’s domicile, international litigation, special grounds of jurisdiction, efficiency principle, Brussels Ia Regulation, European interpretation.

cuadernos de derecho transnacional

Foro del domicilio del demandado y Reglamento Bruselas ‘I-bis 1215/2012’. Análisis crítico de la regla actor sequitur forum rei = The defendant’s domicile in the Brussels ‘The Regulation 1215/2012’. A critical approach of the actor sequitur forum rei rule