English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Resumen: Tras presentar la problematica de la competencia judicial internacional respecto de ac­tos desleales contra competidores en el epigrafe I, en el apartado II se analizan las estrategias procesales a seguir, que basicamente pueden ser de tres tipos: la pactada entre las partes litigantes; la general, valida para cualquier materia patrimonial; y la especifica para actos de competencia desleal. En el epigrafe III, se proyectan estas estrategias en la distinta morfologia de las conductas desleales, segun las esferas de interes de los competidores perjudicados: sus activos intangibles, sus relaciones en el mercado y sus gru­pos de interes (clientes, proveedores, trabajadores…). En el apartado IV, y precisamente por esta morfo­logia tan especifica, se analizan las zonas limitrofes con otras normas de competencia, principalmente, en materia de contratos, en materia de propiedad industrial y en materia concursal. La valoracion final es que, debido al silencio de las normas de competencia en materia de competencia desleal, se depende en exceso de la construccion jurisprudencial del TJUE, la cual tiene luces y sombras. Palabras clave: competencia judicial internacional, competencia desleal, competidores, materia extracontractual, lugar del hecho danoso, activos del competidor, relaciones con los competidores, gru­pos de interes del competidor. Abstract: After presenting the issues of international jurisdiction regarding unfair acts against competitors in section I, in section II the litigation strategies are analyzed, which basically can be of three types: one based on the agreement of the parties; second one based on general rules for any eco­nomic matter; and the third one based on specific rules. In section III, these strategies are projected in the different morphology of unfair acts, according to the areas of interest of the injured competitors: their intangible assets, their relationships in the market and their stakeholders (customers, suppliers, workers...). In section IV, and precisely because of this very specific morphology, the bounderies with other jurisdiction rules are analyzed, mainly in matter of contracts, intellectual property and insolvency. The final assessment is that, due to the silence of the jurisdiction rules in respect of unfair competition, we excessively depend on the case law construction of the CJEU, which has lights and shadows. Keywords: international jurisdiction, unfair competition, competitors, non contractual matters, pla­ce of harmful event, assets of the competitor, relations with competitors, stakeholders of the competitors.

cuadernos de derecho transnacional

Competencia judicial internacional respecto de actos desleales con los competidores = International Jurisdiction in respect of unfair acts with competitors