English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Resumen: Este estudio analiza la jurisprudencia actual (internacional, comparada y espanola) en interpretacion de las normas internacionales y de fuente interna que regulan la eficacia del convenio arbitral. La irrupcion en el trafico de nuevos tipos de convenios arbitrales (clausulas hibridas y clausulas escalacion), asi como la falta de una regulacion ad hoc para determinados supuestos (extension de los efectos del convenio a terceros no firmantes) exigen un estudio comparado de las soluciones dadas a estas cuestiones en las jurisdicciones con mayor tradicion arbitral. Por ultimo, se analizan las posibles consecuencias que la reciente jurisprudencia del TS sobre el principio Kompetenz-kompetenz (“tesis debil”) puede tener sobre el efecto positivo del convenio arbitral; asi como la posible extension al ambito del convenio arbitral de la jurisprudencia del TS sobre responsabilidad por incumplimiento de una clausula de sumision a tribunales espanoles. Palabras clave: Convenio arbitral. Voluntad inequivoca: Ley aplicable al convenio arbitral. Extension de los efectos del convenio arbitral. Clausulas hibridas. Clausulas escalacion . Efectos positivo y negativo del convenio arbitral. Tesis debil de la Kompetenz-kompetenz . Responsabilidad. Abstract: This paper analyzes the current case law (international, comparative and Spanish) in interpretation of international and internal norms that regulate the effectiveness of the arbitration agreement. The emergence of new types of arbitration agreements (hybrid clause and escalation clause), as well as the lack of an ad hoc regulation for certain assumptions (extension of the effects of the agreement to non-signatory third parties) require a comparative study of the Solutions given to these issues in jurisdictions with a greater tradition of arbitration. Finally, the possible consequences that the recent Supreme Court case law on the Kompetenz-kompetenz principle (“soft Thesis”) can have on the positive effect of the arbitration agreement are analyzed, as well as the possible extension to the scope of the arbitration agreement of the Supreme Court case law on liability for breach of a clause of submission to Spanish courts. Keywords: Arbitration agreement. Unequivocal will. Applicable law to the arbitration agreement. Extension of Effects of the arbitration agreement. Hybrid clause. Escalation clause. Positive and negative effects of the arbitration agreement. Soft thesis of Kompetenz-kompetenz. Liability.

El convenio arbitral: statu quo = The arbitration agreement: statu quo