English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Sigmund Freud, dessen Bedeutung bis heute nicht nur fur die Psychologie, son­dern auch fur viele andere wissenschaftlichen Disziplinen unbestreitbar ist, kom­biniert in seinem Essay Das Unheimliche (1919) die von ihm gewonnenen Er­kenntnisse der Psychoanalyse mit Elementen der Literatur, um auf diese Wei­se das Phanomen des ‚Unheimlichen’ zu erklaren. Doch was genau ist das ‚Unheimliche’? Durch welche Faktoren ist es de­ter­mi­niert? Wie setzt Sigmund Freud seine Erkenntnisse aus der Psychoanalyse ein, um das Phanomen des ‚Unheimlichen’ in der Literatur zu erklaren, und damit wie­derum dem ‚Unheimlichen’ naher zu kommen? Und welchen Nutzen hat die Syn­these aus Literatur- und Psychoanalyse fur die Literaturwissenschaft? Ziel des vorliegenden Beitrags ist es, diesen Fragen nachzugehen, indem Sig­mund Freuds Studie uber Das Unheimliche (1919) gefolgt werden soll. Dabei wird zunachst eine Eingrenzung des ‚Unheimlichen’, die Freud aus ety­mo­lo­gischen Uberlegungen schopft, vorgenommen. In einem nachsten Schritt soll die aus der Psychoanalyse abgeleitete Differenzierung des ‚Unheimlichen’ dargelegt wer­den. Darauf aufbauend wird das ‚Unheimliche’ anhand literarischer Texte kon­kret betrachtet und mit der psychoanalytischen Deutung Freuds verbunden. Wel­che Implikationen hieraus fur das Phanomen des ‚Unheimlichen’ folgen und wel­chen Nutzen die Verknupfung von Literatur- und Psychoanalyse fur die Li­te­ra­turwissenschaft haben kann, soll abschliesend betrachtet werden. Schlusselworter: Sigmund Freud, Psychoanalyse, Literaturanalyse. SIGMUND FREUD’DA YAZINSAL ANALIZ VE PSIKOANALIZIN SENTEZI OLARAK 'ESRARENGIZLIK' KAVRAMI Oz: Sadece psikoloji bilimi icin degil, ayni zamanda diger bircok bilim dali icin tartismasiz oneme sahip olan Sigmund Freud, Esrarengizlik (1919) adli yazisinda “esrarengiz” olgusunu aciklayabilmek icin psikoanalize dair fikirlerini yazinsal metinlere uyarlamistir. Boylelikle yazinsal analiz ve psikoanalizi bir araya getirerek disiplinler arasi bir sentez ortaya cikarmistir. Sigmund Freud’a gore “esrarengiz” olgusu tam olarak neyi ifade etmektedir? Hangi etkenler ile ortaya cikmaktadir? Sigmund Freud, yazinda yer alan “esrarengiz” olgusunu aciklamak ve bununla birlikte bu olguyu genel hatlariyla acikliga kavusturmak icin psikoanalize dair kendi fikirlerini nasil uygulamaktadir? Yazin analizi ve psikoanalizi bir araya getirerek olusturulan bu sentezin yazinbilim acisindan ne tur faydalari bulunmaktadir? Bu calismanin amaci, Sigmund Freud’un Esrarengizlik (1919) adli calismasindan yola cikarak yukarida bahsi gecen arastirma sorularina cevap vermektir. Bu baglamda oncelikle Freud’un etimolojik dusuncelerle olusturdugu “esrarengiz” kavraminin tanimi yapilacaktir. Sonraki adimda Sigmund Freud’un psikoanaliz fikirlerine dayanarak acikladigi “esrarengiz” olgusu ile ilgili olarak yaptigi “yasantidaki esrarengizlik” ve “kurgudaki esrarengizlik” arasindaki ayrim irdelenecektir. Buna bagli olarak “esrarengiz” olgusu calisma acisindan uygun olarak nitelendirilebilecek yazinsal metinler ornekleminde ele alinacak ve Freud’un psikoanalitik aciklamalariyla birlestirilecektir. Sonuc bolumunde ise, Sigmund Freud’un Esrarengizlik (1919) adli yazisinda gerceklestirmis oldugu yazinsal analiz ve psikoanaliz sentezi ile “esrarengiz” kavramindan hangi cikarimlarin yapilabilecegi ve bunun yazinbilime hangi faydalari saglayabilecegi tartisilacaktir. Anahtar Sozcukler: Sigmund Freud, Psikoanaliz, Yazin Analizi THE 'UNCANNY' IN SIGMUND FREUD AS A SYNTHESIS OF LITERARY ANALYSIS AND PSYCHOANALYSIS Abstract: Sigmund Freud, a scientist, whose significance in the field of psychology and in many other scientific disciplines is undeniable to this today, merges and implements his psychoanalytical insights to the analysis of literary works in his essay The Uncanny (1919) in order to illuminate the ‘uncanny’ phenomenon. What exactly is the 'uncanny'? By which factors is it determined? How does Sigmund Freud apply his insights from psychoanalysis to explain the phenomenon in literature, and in turn to get closer to the understanding of the 'uncanny' as such? And what is the use of the synthesis of literary analysis and psychoanalysis for literary studies? The aim of this paper is to address these questions by following Freud's essay The Uncanny (1919). First of all, the narrowing of the definition of the 'uncanny' derived from Freud's etymological considerations needs to be carried out. In the following step, the 'uncanny' derived from his psychoanalysis needs to be differentiated into the 'uncanny of experience' and into the 'uncanny of fiction'. On this basis the 'uncanny' is then to be applied specifically to the works of literature resulting in their Freudian psychoanalytic interpretation. In conclusion, the beneficial implications of combining literary analysis and psychoanalysis to the study of the ‘uncanny’ phenomenon and to the literary studies are to be evaluated. Keywords: Sigmund Freud, Psychoanalysis, Literary Analysis

DAS ‚UNHEIMLICHE’ BEI SIGMUND FREUD ALS SYNTHESE AUS LITERATUR- UND PSYCHOANALYSE