English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This article contains the results of a staff helping effort. It is an aid for decision-making and course of action (COA) comparison to staff which is incorporated at the planning and decision making process (DMP) at battalion and brigade level. This aide relies on a newly-proposed method. According to the results of the performed analysis there was a selected group of problem areas during DMP. Additionally analyzing the results from the questionnaire and according to these results, there were specified problem areas related to the phases of the DMP. According to this analysis the most vulnerable phase of DMP is Phase III — COA development/Analysis/Comparison, because it is highly influenced by the subjective evaluation of the evaluators. Another factor which influences DMP is the dissemination of the opinion of experienced officers to the less experienced. This influence differs according to military specialization but it is not always positive. From these results and contemporary valid methods, the authors of this article developed a method which will simplify DMP and also evade intuition and experienced officers’ negative influence from it.

Use of methods for decision-making support in anti-terrorism operations